Science must trump ideology in the GE debate

by The Listener / 18 April, 2019
RelatedArticlesModule - Genetically engineered supergrass

Image/Alamy

A New Zealand-developed super-grass that appears to drastically reduce greenhouse gas emissions might be blocked in this country by the Green Party.

When it comes to protecting the planet, science should always trump ideology.

When it comes to genetic engineering, however, ideology has a lot of noisy mates. GE opponents cite “Brand New Zealand”, our burgeoning organics industry, consumer resistance and the sheer fear of the unknown to support their argument. All this is arrayed against science, even if it’s science that could materially benefit the environment.

New Zealand has developed a potentially world-leading curb on greenhouse-gas emissions: a genetically selected rye grass that drastically reduces stock methane emissions.

But our strict controls on GE have meant we’ve had to trial the grass in the US. Because it is gene-edited, a form of selective breeding, rather than being a full genetic modification, the grass didn’t meet our legal requirements for even heavily controlled propagation. This is an inconvenience and expense, but not the end of the world.

However, a ridiculous perversity looms. Now that the trial has shown the grass appears as effective as its developers hoped, we’re in the bizarre position of being potentially unable to benefit from it ourselves.

The Green Party, which vehemently opposes any GE propagation or experimentation in this country, shows signs of wanting to block the super-grass’ use here – and that of any similar technologies, however beneficial.

The Government’s former chief science adviser, Sir Peter Gluckman, has urged that we open up to such technology, saying it’s doubtful sustainable farming can continue without the use of genetic editing.

However, Greens co-leader James Shaw gave unhelpfully curt answers in Parliament recently when asked about the rye grass’ future. One was a “No” when asked if he agreed with Gluckman about a GE-free future being unsustainable.

His responses were widely read as a refusal even to discuss our shut-out of GE organisms. GE products are not banned as such, but our Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act has near-insurmountable barriers to their propagation or seed and tissue import.

As Gluckman says, it’s time we debated that 23-year-old legislation afresh. New Zealanders have overwhelmingly opposed GE in the past, but there could now be support for discrete exceptions for breakthroughs, such as the super-grass. Few would welcome commonplace GE here, given we’ve always managed highly efficient agriculture without it. It rankles that GE food is routinely sold here without disclosure, because of lax labelling laws, but this, too, may have softened attitudes.

Unhelpfully, Shaw’s response portends an ugly fight within the Government to even get the issue on the agenda. He lacks the numbers to win should push come to shove. But he risks the impression of denying planet-saving technology, just because it also benefits the dairy industry.

As yet, the Greens face no discernible threat from the much-mythologised “blue-green” movement, but this sort of issue could change that. It’s not a stretch to see this intransigence as putting the planet’s urgent needs a distant second to anti-farming and anti-science ideology.

In an interview on TVNZ talk show Q+A earlier this year, Shaw rightly said many consumers disapprove of GE, and have demonstrated they will pay more to avoid it. He also fairly envisioned New Zealand’s optimal trading future as “moving up the value chain” to produce high-quality consumer foods, including organic produce.

But surely “high-value” should now include food that does not severely damage the environment in the process of being produced. There is no evidence the rye grass would “escape” and interfere with other types of plant. The only “damage” from it would be less methane, with the corollary of less need for a drastic reduction of livestock.

It’s the latter that appears to be the Greens’ overriding concern. Methane is not the only reason we need to reassess the scale and deployment of our livestock farming. But the Greens’ refusal to engage in debate about even this potentially game-changing rye grass suggests they have, perhaps inadvertently, let their mission to eliminate animal-based food from people’s lives overtake even the need to curtail climate change.

Add in their refusal to entertain GE as a pest-eradication tool – potentially less polluting and cruel, and more effective than mass-poisoning – and the party strays further towards incoherence. Most New Zealanders would surely back science to protect their environment ahead of what is still a fringe ideology.

This editorial was first published in the April 27, 2019 issue of the New Zealand Listener.

Latest

Why Marlborough, the jewel of NZ's wine industry, is your next destination
My low-rent version of Sisyphus in hell
109522 2019-08-15 00:00:00Z Humour

My low-rent version of Sisyphus in hell

by Michelle Langstone

Michelle Langstone on being injured.

Read more
Requests denied, delayed and redacted
109441 2019-08-14 00:00:00Z Politics

Requests denied, delayed and redacted

by Mike White

Frustrations of the fourth estate.

Read more
Stats NZ could need years to regain public trust
109503 2019-08-14 00:00:00Z Politics

Stats NZ could need years to regain public trust

by Craig McCulloch

The census botch-up has prompted fears the debacle will do long-lasting damage to the public's trust in statistics.

Read more
Gentleman Jack: Suranne Jones on the remarkable Anne Lister
109439 2019-08-14 00:00:00Z Television

Gentleman Jack: Suranne Jones on the remarkable An…

by The Listener

A historical drama about a 19th-century landowner who secretly diarised her relationships with women comes to Neon.

Read more
Hannibal Lecter's creator returns with Cari Mora
108448 2019-08-14 00:00:00Z Books

Hannibal Lecter's creator returns with Cari Mora

by Craig Sisterson

In his first post-Hannibal Lecter book, Thomas Harris heads for Elmore Leonard territory.

Read more
Kiwis in the kitchen: A bite-sized history of NZ cuisine
109468 2019-08-14 00:00:00Z Food

Kiwis in the kitchen: A bite-sized history of NZ c…

by Lauraine Jacobs

Lauraine Jacobs traces the evolution of eating in NZ, from the spartan diet of the war years to the vibrant multi-ethnic melting pot of cuisines...

Read more
The chef bringing the world's cuisine to Kāeo
109526 2019-08-14 00:00:00Z Food

The chef bringing the world's cuisine to Kāeo

by Jenny Ling

Anna Valentine holds cooking workshops in the kitchen of her century-old kauri villa in Kāeo.

Read more