Why you should never say 'now I've seen everything' in politics

by Jane Clifton / 31 October, 2018
Simon Bridges and Paula Bennett. Photo/Getty Images

Simon Bridges and Paula Bennett. Photo/Getty Images

RelatedArticlesModule - Simon Bridges Jami Lee Ross

Just when you thought the coalition Government was the biggest political shock of the past year, Hurricane Jami-Lee arrived.

One thing you should never say about politics is “now I’ve seen everything”. This time last year, the political firmament was in a state of post-traumatic shock over the formation, against all expectations, of a Labour-New Zealand First Government with the Greens in support. It went against decades of electoral orthodoxy and the country could hardly have been more stunned if Winston Peters had joined The Wiggles.

It felt safe to say that this was as big a bombshell as politics could ever provide.

It seemed symptomatic that, just before Christmas, new Opposition chief whip Jami-Lee Ross threw a spectacular tantrum in Parliament, bellowing at the chair, stabbing his order paper about and complaining about lunch being late. At the time, it was put down to cruel disappointment. Like many Nats, he’d fully expected to be settling into his first ministerial office by then. Instead, he was consigned indefinitely to bandying footling procedural points.

Unbeknown to anyone, that was a just a puff from a very deep-rumbling volcano. A year on, the Botany MP has supplied the blockbuster of all “now I’ve seen everything” moments.

It’s another summer of PTSD all round – and the tectonic plates are still shifting, with no one, least of all Ross, having any agency over when or how it will end.

Normally, speculation such as that now hanging over Simon Bridges’ leadership would be the crowning sensation in any political kerfuffle. Here, it’s the least of it.

It’s hard for National to figure out which zone of fallout to triage first. The most arresting situation is Ross’ allegedly toxic behaviour to several women, including staff, which assumes a new urgency in the #MeToo era. But, in order to get there, National has to tread the eggshell path of Ross’ apparently fragile mental health. His commission to a mental-health facility for three nights put speculation on hold – save from some particularly inane “state gulag” ranting from the tinfoil truther fraternity.

Since then, further sensational and troubling private communications have seeped out and seem likely to continue to. These feed prurience and nothing else. They’re nigh impossible to justify airing on public-interest grounds; though they might be very interesting to the public, that’s not the same thing.

It’s impossible for this material to be viewed in its full context or judged with any degree of fairness. People talk and text nonsense, especially when they’re tired or upset. The material Ross has squirrelled away for his war on Bridges is dynamite, in part because it could give the impression it’s not just Ross who is guilty of extramarital dalliance, to which he admits, but that other Nats have been at the least somewhat licentious.

Public prurience

Duelling cries have gone up: “Is Parliament deteriorating into a 70s wife-swapping party? We demand to be told!” versus, “What business of anyone’s is an MP’s personal life? No laws have been broken.”

Until now, the line in the sand has been the hypocrisy test. Outside the old News of the World wilds, the journalistic orthodoxy has always been that such personal indiscretions as boozing or illicit affairs go unreported unless the public figure concerned is guilty of obvious double-standards. #MeToo shifted the public interest sand line to: was there an imbalance of power, and/or abuse? Ross does appear to have used his position to bully women, including those with whom he was in a relationship.

But the airing of Ross’ dirty laundry would affect, unfairly implicate or simply devastate not just those immediately involved, but their families and innocent colleagues. This makes the demands that it all be made public seem pretty reckless and heartless.

Ross vowed to spill it all, and even if he doesn’t, the depressing inevitability is that someone else won’t be able to help themselves. Then, others will relish being righteously disgusted about how “politics has hit a new low”.

Some have fairly called for better pastoral care in politics. Over decades, lone MPs have been left to eddy into serious, furniture-wrecking wig outs. All parties could do more to look after one another. But MPs are elected, not hired. They have autonomy beyond their caucus hierarchies.

Also, people are typically self-protective about their dysfunction and sly about their bad behaviour. From what has come out, it seems likely Ross was both. Perhaps the only simple truth about what has happened is that no one could have handled it well. Ross both behaved sackably – his public disloyalty has been monumental, whatever his private conduct – and was mentally ill. No leader could deal with the first without risk to the second – but no leader could leave the disloyalty unaddressed.

It’s also now clear Bridges’ use of the word “embarrassing” wasn’t intended as a crass comment on Ross’ mental health, but was his genuine, gobsmacked response to newly discovering how badly Ross had behaved. He may have made a bad situation worse at times, and the tape of him swearing like an old navvy and daydreaming about rinsing effing useless list MPs may yet prove unsurvivable.

Picking up the pieces

Given the enormity of what Ross has brought upon the party, Bridges’ fumbles are irrelevant for now. Whatever he, his deputy Paula Bennett or the remarkably inert party president Peter Goodfellow did or didn’t do, Ross was ready to self-detonate come what may.

“Pick up the pieces” would be a better motto than the current “Heads must roll!” The blame caravan is trundling towards Bennett and Goodfellow, but that’s the proxy paddywhacks exercise a party resorts to when it can’t punish the real offender. Ross is tragically self-punishing. National can only minimise further damage by staying unified until Hurricane Jami-Lee has safely passed, however long that takes.

There’s been a remarkably modest poll hit so far, and while Bridges’ personal numbers are rather worse, this is not the time to beat the jungle drums. Because one orthodoxy hasn’t changed: three times in four, swapping leaders in Opposition is just bolting from the frying pan into the fire – or another frying pan, if you’re lucky. Best stick with the fixer-upper leader and hope for improvement, or for a new marquee candidate like John Key or Jacinda Ardern to materialise.

Oh, and set the timer to take cover from another bumper “now I’ve seen everything” bunfight same time next year.

This article was first published in the November 3, 2018 issue of the New Zealand Listener.


Science must trump ideology in the GE debate
104784 2019-04-18 08:52:29Z Politics

Science must trump ideology in the GE debate

by The Listener

A New Zealand-developed super-grass that appears to drastically reduce greenhouse gas emissions might be blocked in this country by the Green Party.

Read more
Simon Bridges hails PM Jacinda Ardern's capital gains tax u-turn as victory
104803 2019-04-18 00:00:00Z Politics

Simon Bridges hails PM Jacinda Ardern's capital ga…

by Jo Moir

The National Party is calling the u-turn on a capital gains tax a massive failure for the Prime Minister.

Read more
John Campbell is replacing Jack Tame on TVNZ's Breakfast show
104860 2019-04-18 00:00:00Z Television

John Campbell is replacing Jack Tame on TVNZ's Bre…

by Noted

The TV network is switching things up - again.

Read more
John Lanchester’s ecological-dystopian tale about a barricaded Britain
104431 2019-04-18 00:00:00Z Books

John Lanchester’s ecological-dystopian tale about…

by Catherine Woulfe

The Wall may be speculative fiction, but it feel like it's just round the corner.

Read more
Why we should take care when we talk about drug side effects
104426 2019-04-18 00:00:00Z Psychology

Why we should take care when we talk about drug si…

by Marc Wilson

If we find that up to 10% of people report insomnia after taking Panadol, does that mean it was a side effect of the drug?

Read more
Capital Gains Tax debate should have been a godsend for Simon Bridges
104754 2019-04-17 00:00:00Z Politics

Capital Gains Tax debate should have been a godsen…

by Bevan Rapson

Talk of a capital gains tax hits a particular nerve, but changing the tax system doesn’t always have to be like pulling teeth.

Read more
Government abandons capital gains tax plan
104759 2019-04-17 00:00:00Z Politics

Government abandons capital gains tax plan

by Noted

No consensus was reached over the capital gains tax recommendation.

Read more
How tough is it for the middle class in New Zealand?
104675 2019-04-17 00:00:00Z Social issues

How tough is it for the middle class in New Zealan…

by Pattrick Smellie

Money worries have set off a wave of populist politics in most Western democracies, but not here. Pattrick Smellie investigates why.

Read more