How the proximity of unhealthy food affects the way you eat

by Jennifer Bowden / 28 March, 2019
RelatedArticlesModule - Unhealthy food proximity

Photo/Getty Images

Researchers find that the closer unhealthy food is to you, the more likely you are to eat it, but the same isn't true for healthy food. 

There are three types of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics. Deciding which of those categories former Cornell University professor Brian Wansink’s research falls into is probably semantics. But, by the end of 2018, 17 of Wansink’s published research papers, most focusing on consumer behaviour around food, had been retracted by scientific journals.

Even if you’ve never heard of Wansink, you’ve probably read some of his research. His studies have been cited more than 20,000 times. Findings, such as the idea that eating off smaller plates will make you eat less, or that hungry shoppers buy more calories than satiated shoppers, or that giving vegetables cool-sounding names will help kids eat more of them, were all produced by Wansink’s research laboratory at Cornell University.

So, if you shop while hungry, will you buy more food than you would if you’d just eaten? If you place a chocolate bar close to your chair, will you eat more of it during the day? And, if you were given a large bowl, would you serve yourself more ice cream than you would if you’d been given a smaller one?

Yes, yes and yes would have been the answers, until recently, but after a group of scientists and journalists began delving into the research by the “world-renowned eating-behaviour expert”, they found some unsavoury truths.

By December 2017, six of Wansink’s papers had been retracted and 14 corrections issued. The retractions continued throughout 2018, culminating in September 2018 with the Journal of the American Medical Association retracting six of Wansink’s studies and noting that Cornell could not “provide assurances regarding the scientific validity of the six studies”. In September 2018, Cornell announced that Wansink had been removed from all teaching and research duties and would retire in June 2019.

So, where does that leave us in deciding which plates to use for dinner, or whether we need to place our chocolate at the far end of the kitchen?

Fortunately, Wansink isn’t the only researcher investigating our eating habits. In 2019, the journal Appetite published a study by University of Cambridge researchers. They investigated what effect the placement of more-nutritious or less-nutritious snacks had on intake.

Using raisins as a more-nutritious option and M&M’s candies as a less-nutritious option, they trialled four placements of the snacks on a table close to a person: the raisins near (20cm) and the M&M’s far (70cm); both foods near; the M&M’s near and the raisins far; and both far.

Under the guise of taking part in a relaxation and memory study, 248 people were placed under cognitive load – they had to memorise a seven-digit code – to distract them and compromise their usual self-control. They were then left alone for a 10-minute “relaxation break” with the two bowls of food.

At the end of the session, the researchers recorded how much of each snack the participants had eaten in the four different bowl configurations.

They discovered the likelihood of consuming healthier food (in this case, raisins) was unaffected by its placement and proximity to a less-healthy food. However, the likelihood of eating a less-healthy food (M&M’s) was influenced by closer placement and possibly by proximity to a healthier food.

So, it seems we are less likely to eat unhealthy foods such as chocolate when they are placed further away from where we are seated. This finding is in line with those of previous studies on the topic, including those by the now-infamous Wansink.

It remains to be seen whether many of Wansink’s other findings will be duplicated. Until that time, they remain a case of spurious statistical manipulation.

This article was first published in the March 2, 2019 issue of the New Zealand Listener.

Latest

Why The Hustle has no sting
106053 2019-05-22 00:00:00Z Movies

Why The Hustle has no sting

by James Robins

A gender-swapping redo of a con-man comedy doesn't make good on its promise.

Read more
John Campbell sits down for Breakfast, with nothing to eat
105720 2019-05-22 00:00:00Z Television

John Campbell sits down for Breakfast, with nothin…

by Diana Wichtel

John Campbell on TVNZ’s Breakfast. There was a time when the idea would have seemed preposterous.

Read more
Conservatives say they’re happier, but liberals act happier. Here's why
105463 2019-05-22 00:00:00Z Psychology

Conservatives say they’re happier, but liberals ac…

by Marc Wilson

Much of the work on happiness is based on surveys, but what happens if we examine what people actually do?

Read more
Fresh tips in suspected cold case murder of Auckland teen
106082 2019-05-21 00:00:00Z Crime

Fresh tips in suspected cold case murder of Auckla…

by Donna Chisholm

Police are following up several new tips in the suspected cold case murder of Auckland teen Joanne “Joe” Chatfield.

Read more
Families witness as Pike River mine re-entry attempt begins
106112 2019-05-21 00:00:00Z Social issues

Families witness as Pike River mine re-entry attem…

by RNZ

The Pike River re-entry team steps through the double airlock doors today, watched by families of the 29 men who died in the 2010 tragedy.

Read more
How the Republican Party is effectively placing Donald Trump above the law
106064 2019-05-21 00:00:00Z World

How the Republican Party is effectively placing Do…

by Paul Thomas

The Republicans' strategy of not co-operating with Congress is undermining the system of checks and balances enshrined in the US Constitution.

Read more
NZ Listener and North & South win at NZ's top media awards
106058 2019-05-20 00:00:00Z Innovation

NZ Listener and North & South win at NZ's top medi…

by Noted

New Zealand's leading current affairs magazines pick up Voyager Media Awards.

Read more
Dancing with the Stars is a parable for democracy in the age of Trump
106060 2019-05-20 00:00:00Z Television

Dancing with the Stars is a parable for democracy…

by Diana Wichtel

The people have spoken on the hit TV dance-off and we deserve everything we get.

Read more